Canon 7D Mark ii vs Canon 6D?
Here is my story, I owned the original Canon 7D, I then got a 5D Mark ii. Then the 5D Mark iii came out, I got it. I went to Sony for a year and came back to Canon, I decided to just get the 6D since the image quality is the same as the 5D Mark iii without the extra features.
Well, i've seen all these features on the 7D Mark ii and I really want them. I also wouldn't mind having a crop body for certain things.
But how big of a difference is the image quality? I had my 7D when they were brand new and I was just learning. I didn't know how to test just how big the image quality difference was back then.
I'm not speaking about high ISO's.
But at low ISO's outdoors, how big a difference are the colors, sharpness, etc? Noticeable? What about prints, even at at low ISO can I print with a 7D?
I don't want to get the 5D Mark iii because it's too close to being just like my 6D. I am going to get the 5D Mark IV, it will have these features, but in the meantime I'd like to have these features for certain shoots and like I said, I wouldn't mind having a fast FPS crop body in my kit.
Is there anyone here who has full frame and a 7D? Do you ever pick up the 7D? Or do you say, "Full frame, less features, but better image quality, always going for that?"
Read responses in dpreview.com